WRU Info
Consultation tracker
A clear, neutral explanation of the WRU consultation process, the models presented, concerns raised and information still missing.
Step 1
Purpose
Set out what the process is intended to answer and what evidence has been published.
Step 2
Participants
Identify the people and bodies consulted, and what questions were asked.
Step 3
Open questions
Record missing information, related documents and ClubHub discussion.
Evidence method
How this page is built.
- Summary
- A neutral record of the WRU consultation: who was consulted, what models were presented, what the public survey asked, and what remains missing.
- Source
- WRU consultation pack and public-facing summary materials.
- What it says
- The consultation set out reform options around the structure of the professional game, asking members and supporters to express preferences across a defined range.
- Why it matters
- A consultation only carries weight if members can see the source, the models, the assumptions and the gaps. Otherwise it becomes a vote on a summary, not on evidence.
- What remains unclear
- The public material does not yet expose model-by-model financial assumptions, transition costs, or independent verification of the claims behind each option.
- Related discussion
- ClubHub: consultation discussionClubHub: structural reform
- Last updated
- 30 April 2026