Why Four Regions
Four regions remain defensible if the standards around them improve and the source data is tested openly.
The structural case for retaining four regional destinations while tightening system standards.
What this page covers
Why Four Regions
The structural case for retaining four regional destinations while tightening system standards.
Opportunity volume and pathway reach remain central to the case.
Regional identity and local legitimacy still matter commercially and politically.
Comparator lessons are useful when treated as mechanism transfer, not imitation.
Editorial note
The narrow claim here is four regions plus reform, not four regions plus the status quo.